Cultivation

Silage and haylage

Cultivation of maize for silage and haylage aims to maximize the energy value of biomass through the selection of hybrids with high fiber digestibility and optimal grain composition. Key factors include leafiness, the Stay Green effect, and the balance between yield and feed quality.

Mentioned in descriptions 13 089 varieties reference book.

When selecting a hybrid for silage or haylage use, the priority becomes the total energy value of the plant rather than just grain yield. Breeding of such hybrids is focused on improving digestibility by reducing the content of indigestible lignin and improving the structure of plant fibers. Distinguishing features include increased leafiness and the Stay Green effect, which allows plants to remain green longer, extending the optimal harvest window without quality loss.

The choice of variety directly affects the efficiency of fermentation in the bunker and the digestibility of feed in the animal rumen. For silage, hybrids with floury or semi-dent grain types are preferred, as they are easier to grind and more quickly digestible. High phytosanitary resistance to diseases such as boil smut, fusarium, and stalk rots is critically important, as plant infection significantly reduces the quality of the final feed.

Agronomic practices for silage crops allow for an increase in plant density by 15–20% relative to grain crops; however, excessive thickening leads to a decrease in the proportion of ears and a drop in the total energy of the mass. Optimal harvesting is carried out when the moisture content of the entire biomass reaches the 30–35% range. The economic efficiency of using such varieties is evaluated by indicators of fiber digestibility and digestible starch content, which determines livestock productivity.

Sources10

Breakdown by crop

Found in these crops

Maize 2 337 Maize 763 Italian ryegrass 142 Perennial ryegrass 131 Alfalfa 108 Italian ryegrass 105 Sudangrass 67 Sorghum 66 Red clover 63 Triticale 60 Westerwolds Ryegrass 53 Sorghum 41

Varieties that feature this in their description

Selection based on the description text, not official resistance ratings: such data is not available in registers. Mention indicates that the trait is discussed in the variety's sources; see the variety's profile for details on what is specifically stated.

Cegura

Active

Zea mays L. subsp. mays (Maize Group) · Maize

3 records

Cedona

Active

Zea mays L. subsp. mays (Maize Group) · Maize

3 records

Cemata

Active

Zea mays L. subsp. mays (Maize Group) · Maize

3 records

Big Bertha BMR

Active

Sorghum x drummondii (Steud.) Millsp. & Chase · Sudangrass

2 records

Arigato

Active

Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench · Sorghum

2 records

Almaz

Active

Zea mays L. · Maize

2 records

Adentio

Protection expired

Zea mays L. · Maize

2 records

ZETA350S

Active

Zea mays L. · Maize

2 records

Xxilo

Active

Zea mays L. subsp. mays (Maize Group) · Maize

2 records

Yty

Terminated

Avena sativa L. · Oat

2 records

WL 324

Terminated

Medicago sativa L. · Alfalfa

2 records

ZE Hilda

Active

Zea mays L. · Maize

2 records

Wilhelmiina

Terminated

Avena sativa L. · Oat

3 records

ZE Zeamax

Active

Zea mays L. · Maize

3 records

Zas Osevia

Active

Zea mays L. · Maize

2 records

Trail Boss BMR

Active

Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench subsp. bicolor · Sorghum

2 records

Vilma

Protection expired

Zea mays L. · Maize

2 records

Sebastiano

Terminated

Zea mays L. · Maize

2 records

Tympan

Active

Lolium multiflorum Lam. ssp. italicum (A. Br.) Volkart · Italian ryegrass

3 records

Trubadur

Active

Trifolium pratense L. · Red clover

3 records

Toskana

Protection expired

Zea mays L. · Maize

2 records

Sioux DAN HS 33

Terminated

Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench · Sorghum

2 records

Talisco

Active

Zea mays L. subsp. mays (Maize Group) · Maize

2 records

Stroncia

Active

Zea mays L. · Maize

2 records

1 2 ... 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 ... 182 183 Next

Jump to page 26 40 52 78 105 130 131 150 157

Cultivation

All terms →

Text source

This summary is compiled from the publications listed in the sources and verified by an editor. It contains no legally significant information; it provides agronomic context for registry data rather than the registry data itself.