Variety traits

Sugar content

Sugar content is an indicator of the concentration of natural sugars in fruits or root crops, determining nutritional value and suitability for processing. This genetic trait is measured in degrees Brix (°Brix) or sugar degrees (°Z) and is critical for assessing variety quality.

Mentioned in descriptions 14 616 varieties reference book.

Sugar content characterizes the concentration of glucose, fructose, and sucrose in plant tissues. For the processing industry, this indicator is a key requirement determining the yield of the finished product, whereas for table crops, it shapes the flavor balance in combination with acidity. A variety's ability to accumulate sugars promptly also allows for effective planning of harvest dates and production facility capacity.

Sugar content is measured using laboratory and field methods. Refractometry allows for the assessment of solids content in degrees Brix, polarimetry determines sucrose concentration in international sugar degrees, and areometry establishes the indicator by measuring juice density. The choice of method depends on the crop and the objectives of the analysis, whether for express assessment or establishing the commercial value of raw materials.

The realization of the genetic potential for sugar content depends on environmental conditions and agrotechnics. Light intensity and the sum of active temperatures, which determine the intensity of photosynthesis, have a significant influence, as do moisture availability and mineral nutrition, particularly potassium supply. During variety trials, breeding material is compared with standards, which allows for the identification of varieties with high stability of sugar accumulation under various climatic conditions.

Sources10

Breakdown by crop

Sugar Content — Sugar Beet 964 Tomato Brix Content 395 Melon Sugar Content 370 Watermelon sweetness 306 Grape sugar content 236 Sugar content in apples 145 Peach Sugar Content 128 Grape Sugar Content 126 Sugar Content — Garden Strawberry 109 Carrot sugar content 85 Sweetness of sweet cherry 82 Apricot sugar content 61 Sugar Content — Sweet Corn 61 Sugar content in pepper 46 Sugar Content — Table Beet 45 Plum sugar content 45 Sugar content — perennial ryegrass 41 Sugar content — Japanese plum 40 Sugar content in sugar beet 30 Sugar Content — White Cabbage 29 Sugar content in peas 26 Pear sugar content 24 Sugar content in raspberries 23 Sweetness of sweet corn 21

Found in these crops

Sugar beet 2 073 Grapevine 519 Tomato 489 Melon 421 Watermelon 360 Common grape vine 270 Apple 195 Carrot 166 Peach 160 Garden strawberry 128 Pea 121 Sweet corn 102

Varieties that feature this in their description

Selection based on the description text, not official resistance ratings: such data is not available in registers. Mention indicates that the trait is discussed in the variety's sources; see the variety's profile for details on what is specifically stated.

Citrum

Active

Cucumis melo L. · Melon

Syngenta Seeds B.V.

8 records

Compass

Active

Raphanus sativus L. var. oleiformis Pers. · Oil radish

PHP PETERSEN

8 records

Carmen

Active

Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. & Nakai · Watermelon

Takii Europe, NL

6 records

Canopy

Active

Malus domestica (Suckow) Borkh. · Apple

IFO SARL (FR)

5 records

Cambria

Active

Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck · Sweet orange

Mr Hendrik Johannes Smith

8 records

Boldor

Active

Beta vulgaris Garden Beet Group · Garden beet

BEJO ZADEN

8 records

Big Star

Active

Prunus avium (L.) L. · Sweet cherry

Universita degli Studi di Bologna (IT)/C.R.P.V. Centro Ricerche Produzioni Vegetali - Societa Coop. (IT)

7 records

Apricandy

Active

Prunus armeniaca L. · Apricot

Laurence Mallard, Agro Selections Fruits SAS

7 records

Amaranta

Active

Rubus idaeus L. · Red raspberry

Sara Giacomelli, Marco Giacomelli, Sara Fontanari y Alessandra Viliotti.

8 records

Amal

Active

Cucumis melo L. · Melon

HM CLAUSE, FR

6 records

Arashan

Active

Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. & Nakai · Watermelon

XINGPING ZHANG

5 records

Aberzeus

Active

Lolium perenne L. · Perennial ryegrass

Aberystwyth University (IBERS)

8 records

V15L105

Active

Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam. · Sweet potato

Vineland Research and Innovation Centre

5 records

ZESH004

Active

Actinidia chinensis Planch. x Actinidia deliciosa (A. Chev.) C. F. Liang & A. R. Ferguson

The New Zealand Institute for Plant and Food Research

5 records

UCD Mojo

Active

Fragaria x ananassa Duchesne ex Rozier · Garden strawberry

University of California, Plant Sciences, Davis / University of California, Plant Sciences, Davis

5 records

UCD Finn

Active

Fragaria x ananassa Duchesne ex Rozier · Garden strawberry

University of California, Plant Sciences, Davis / University of California, Plant Sciences, Davis

5 records

UC Surfline

Active

Fragaria x ananassa Duchesne ex Rozier · Garden strawberry

University of California, Plant Sciences, Davis / University of California, Plant Sciences, Davis

6 records

Sugrathirtytwo

Active

Vitis vinifera L. · Common grape vine

David W. Cain, Michael J. Striem, Sun World International LLC

5 records

Sugrafifty

Active

Vitis vinifera L. · Common grape vine

Terry A Bacon

7 records

Sunectwentyone

Active

Prunus persica (L.) Batsch · Peach

Terry A. Bacon^^^David W. Cain

6 records

Takano 6

Active

Malus domestica (Suckow) Borkh. · Apple

Takao Takano

5 records

Sheegene 25

Active

Vitis L. · Grapevine

Timothy P.Sheehan

5 records

Sheegene 12

Active

Vitis L. · Grapevine

Timothy P.Sheehan

6 records

Teak Gold

Active

Prunus salicina Lindl. · Japanese plum

Yates, R. A.|deceased, late of Capel, Australia, by Neal William Yates, legal representative

7 records

1 2 ... 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 ... 278 279 Next

Jump to page 29 49 80 120 139 159 199 239

Variety traits

Maturity group 89 063
Yield 67 000
Vigor 53 548
Plant height 51 504
Lodging 50 198
Taste and aroma 36 010
Variety origin 29 523
Productivity 27 845

All terms →

Text source

This summary is compiled from the publications listed in the sources and verified by an editor. It contains no legally significant information; it provides agronomic context for registry data rather than the registry data itself.