Cultivation

Suitability for processing

Suitability for processing is the conformity of the harvest to strict biochemical and morphological standards required for industrial equipment operation. Selecting a variety for processing requires prioritizing raw material quality over maximum yield.

Mentioned in descriptions 31 676 varieties reference book.

Suitability for processing refers to the conformity of agricultural products to specific biochemical and morphological parameters defined by industrial standards. It is manifested in the stability of indicators affecting the final product yield, such as starch, dry matter, and sugar content in potatoes, or vitreousness and protein content in cereal crops.

Technological suitability depends on morphological traits, including fruit shape and eye depth, which determine the percentage of waste during mechanical peeling. When cultivating such varieties, agronomic practices are characterized by strict regulation of mineral nutrition and limited use of organic fertilizers to ensure the required chemical composition of the produce.

The evaluation of a variety's suitability is based on the stability of quality indicators under varying weather conditions and during storage, rather than solely on yield parameters. A variety's resistance to processing requirements is determined by its technological adaptability, which allows for guaranteed achievement of target raw material parameters in specific soil and climatic conditions.

Sources9

Breakdown by crop

Found in these crops

Tomato 983 Apple 889 Bell pepper 750 Lettuce 653 Maize 569 Potato 506 Carrot 376 Common bean 314 Pea 272 European pear 266 White cabbage 263 European plum 260

Varieties that feature this in their description

Selection based on the description text, not official resistance ratings: such data is not available in registers. Mention indicates that the trait is discussed in the variety's sources; see the variety's profile for details on what is specifically stated.

UG849

Active

Solanum lycopersicum L. · Tomato

1 record

Toledo

Withdrawn

Allium porrum L. · Leek

1 record

SLUBGD0953

Active

Malus Mill. · Apple

1 record

Sador

Withdrawn

Cucurbita pepo L. · Field pumpkin

1 record

REINA CLAUDIA D'OULLINS

Active

Prunus domestica L. · European plum

1 record

Olle®

Active

Vaccinium corymbosum L. · Highbush blueberry

1 record

Novapeel

Terminated

Solanum lycopersicum L. · Tomato

1 record

Minowase Nr.2.

Terminated

Raphanus sativus L. · Radish

1 record

MALLORQUI

Active

Cicer arietinum L. · Chickpea

1 record

Hudson

Terminated

Brassica oleracea L. (White Cabbage Group) · White cabbage

2 records

25LL0217A

Application submitted

Helianthus annuus L. · Sunflower

2 records

25UU1427A

Application submitted

Helianthus annuus L. · Sunflower

2 records

Znaimer Gurke

Withdrawn

Cucumis sativus L. · Cucumber

1 record

Zhuni Hito

Active

Hydrangea macrophylla (Thunb.) Ser. · Bigleaf hydrangea

Information regarding the breeder received in the contribution to CPVO :Japan

1 record

Zbihniev

Terminated

Crataegus L. · Hawthorn

1 record

Zaporizkyi 26

Application submitted

Helianthus annuus L. · Sunflower

1 record

Zeta

Active

Fragaria L. · Strawberry

1 record

Xian

Active

Hydrangea macrophylla (Thunb.) Ser. · Bigleaf hydrangea

Information regarding the breeder received in the contribution to CPVO :Santho Beheer B.v. (Eveleens C.P.)

1 record

ZANE

Application submitted

Prunus domestica L. · European plum

1 record

Westerveld

Active

Mespilus germanica L. · Medlar

1 record

Wangenheimer Frühzwetsche

Active

Prunus domestica L. subsp. insititia (L.) C. K. Schneid. · Damson

1 record

Vitius

Terminated

Lactuca sativa L. · Lettuce

1 record

Vocal F1

Application submitted

Cucumis sativus L. · Cucumber

1 record

Viktoria

Terminated

Daucus carota L. · Carrot

1 record

1 2 ... 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 ... 584 585 Next

Jump to page 84 167 251 334 361 418 451 471 501 561

Cultivation

All terms →

Text source

This summary is compiled from the publications listed in the sources and verified by an editor. It contains no legally significant information; it provides agronomic context for registry data rather than the registry data itself.