Cultivation

Suitability for processing

Suitability for processing is the conformity of the harvest to strict biochemical and morphological standards required for industrial equipment operation. Selecting a variety for processing requires prioritizing raw material quality over maximum yield.

Mentioned in descriptions 31 676 varieties reference book.

Suitability for processing refers to the conformity of agricultural products to specific biochemical and morphological parameters defined by industrial standards. It is manifested in the stability of indicators affecting the final product yield, such as starch, dry matter, and sugar content in potatoes, or vitreousness and protein content in cereal crops.

Technological suitability depends on morphological traits, including fruit shape and eye depth, which determine the percentage of waste during mechanical peeling. When cultivating such varieties, agronomic practices are characterized by strict regulation of mineral nutrition and limited use of organic fertilizers to ensure the required chemical composition of the produce.

The evaluation of a variety's suitability is based on the stability of quality indicators under varying weather conditions and during storage, rather than solely on yield parameters. A variety's resistance to processing requirements is determined by its technological adaptability, which allows for guaranteed achievement of target raw material parameters in specific soil and climatic conditions.

Sources9

Breakdown by crop

Found in these crops

Tomato 983 Apple 889 Bell pepper 750 Lettuce 653 Maize 569 Potato 506 Carrot 376 Common bean 314 Pea 272 European pear 266 White cabbage 263 European plum 260

Varieties that feature this in their description

Selection based on the description text, not official resistance ratings: such data is not available in registers. Mention indicates that the trait is discussed in the variety's sources; see the variety's profile for details on what is specifically stated.

Roksana

Active

Petroselinum crispum (Mill.) Nyman ex A. W. Hill · Parsley

1 record

Record

Active

Benincasa hispida (Thunb.) Cogn. · Wax gourd

1 record

Roccoma F1

Application submitted

Brassica oleracea L. (Red Cabbage Group) · Red cabbage

1 record

Pietroase Donissen

Active

Prunus avium (L.) L. · Sweet cherry

1 record

Rakovszky

Protection expired

Prunus armeniaca L. · Apricot

1 record

Pioner F1

Application submitted

Brassica rapa L. subsp. pekinensis (Lour.) Hanelt · Napa cabbage

1 record

Schriek

Active

Cichorium intybus L. (Witloof Chicory Group) · Witloof chicory

1 record

Riccia di Napoli

Active

Solanum tuberosum L. · Potato

2 records

RIBET

Application submitted

Corylus avellana L. · Common hazel

1 record

Salsa

Active

Brassica napus var. napus · Rapeseed

2 records

Ribe (Euribe)

Terminated

Oryza sativa L. · Rice

1 record

Sajana

Protection expired

Rubus idaeus L. · Red raspberry

1 record

Piatta d'Egitto

Terminated

Beta vulgaris Garden Beet Group · Garden beet

1 record

Sapporo

Terminated

Tulipa L. · Tulip

1 record

SA12053

Application submitted

Zea mays L. · Maize

2 records

Regina Rossa

Application submitted

Cichorium intybus L. · Chicory

1 record

Salomon

Withdrawn

Avena nuda L. · Naked oat

1 record

Papillon

Active

Hydrangea macrophylla (Thunb.) Ser. · Bigleaf hydrangea

Information regarding the breeder received in the contribution to CPVO :Mouillère E.

1 record

Pavla

Active

Solanum lycopersicum L. · Tomato

1 record

Rozove chudo F1

Terminated

Solanum lycopersicum L. · Tomato

2 records

Pannonia

Active

Prunus armeniaca L. · Apricot

1 record

Royal Design

Active

Tulipa L. · Tulip

1 record

Rossa di Treviso precoce

Active

Cichorium intybus L. · Chicory

1 record

ROXI

Terminated

Brassica oleracea L. (Red Cabbage Group) · Red cabbage

1 record

1 2 ... 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 ... 584 585 Next

Jump to page 84 167 251 334 372 418 462 482 501 572

Cultivation

All terms →

Text source

This summary is compiled from the publications listed in the sources and verified by an editor. It contains no legally significant information; it provides agronomic context for registry data rather than the registry data itself.